IP Blog Series | Understanding Intellectual Property: Why It Matters in Kentucky
- morganfloyd77
- Nov 4, 2025
- 6 min read

Intellectual Property Blog Series: Blog 1
Author: Jay L. Phillips
When clients come to our firm from Lexington, Louisville, Paducah, Pikeville, or anywhere in Kentucky, many have innovative ideas, creative works, or brand aspirations—but far fewer understand how the law protects those intangible assets. As an attorney Lexington KY business owners trust, I discuss the implications of patent and IP law to our clients almost every day.
Intellectual property (IP) is the legal foundation for protecting inventions, creative works, brands, and valuable business secrets. As a full-service firm with a strong focus on Intellectual Property law, we believe it’s critical for innovators, businesses, and creators in Kentucky (and nationwide) to recognize the different IP tools available and when each is appropriate.
In this multi-part blog series, we will explore: an overview of intellectual property, patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and Name Image and Likeness rights (NIL). Read more to explore what intellectual property is, why you should seek guidance from an experienced attorney Lexington KY residents trust.
What is Intellectual Property?
Intellectual property refers to legal rights granted over creations of the mind. Unlike physical property—real estate or a car—IP is intangible: ideas, designs, brand identifiers, software, inventions, and confidential business information. The law recognizes these as valuable assets and provides mechanisms to exclude others from using them without permission, under specific conditions.
In the United States, the principal categories of IP protection are:
Patents
Copyrights
Trademarks (and service marks)
Trade Secrets
Each has distinct legal standards, durations, scopes, and enforcement mechanisms. In practice, many businesses and creators use a combination of these protections to build layered defenses around their intellectual capital.
Why bother? Because IP protection helps you:
Maintain a competitive edge
Prevent misappropriation or infringement
Monetize your creations (through licensing, sale, assignment)
Enhance valuation or investment appeal
Provide legal recourse when others infringe
From a public policy perspective, U.S. constitutional and statutory law encourages innovation by giving inventors, authors, and creators a limited monopoly in exchange for disclosure (in the case of patents) or public access (in the case of copyrights).

Why It Matters in Kentucky
Kentucky businesses and creators stand to benefit especially from understanding IP protection, and local law intersects in useful ways. As a qualified attorney Lexington KY residents trust, I understand just how crucial this is for your business.
Local business branding and trademarks: Many Kentucky businesses may register state-level marks or rely on common law rights, but a federal trademark often offers broader protection across state lines.
Trade secrets under Kentucky law: Kentucky has its own statutory scheme for trade secret misappropriation (KRS § 365.880 to 365.900) that supplements federal protections.
Confidentiality protections in regulatory settings: Kentucky statutes explicitly protect trade secret confidentiality in certain administrative or inspection settings.
Local creative and cultural works: Kentucky authors, artists, musicians, designers, and entrepreneurs produce creative works that may benefit from copyright, trademark, or trade secret protection.
Patent-driven innovation: Many of the inventions conceived in Kentucky—whether from manufacturing, life sciences, software, agriculture, or energy—need the national (and international) reach that U.S. and foreign patents provide. Because patents are federal rights, your innovation in Kentucky can (and often should) be protected broadly.
Attracting investment or exit value: For startups or businesses in Kentucky seeking growth or exit, a solid IP portfolio (especially patents) can significantly enhance valuation and buyer confidence.
So while some protections like trade secrets or state trademarks have local relevance, patents and copyrights operate on a national (and sometimes international) scale. In fact, clients often assume “once I protect it in Kentucky, I’m done”—but that's rarely sufficient. Many business owners seek an attorney Lexington KY clients trust to understand how to fill in the gaps.

Choosing the Right IP Tool: A Strategic Lens
At a high level, which type of IP protection makes sense depends on:
The nature of your asset (invention, literary work, brand name, secret process)
How you plan to use or commercialize it
The competitive risk of reverse engineering or copying
Your budget and timeline
Whether disclosure (required in patents) is acceptable
Here is a comparative sketch:
Asset Type / Goal | Preferred IP Tool(s) | Key Advantages | Limitations / Considerations |
A new machine, process, or system | Patent | Exclusive right to exclude others for a term (usually 20 years) | Requires public disclosure, expensive to obtain & maintain |
A software program, novel algorithm, or semiconductor layout | Patent (or in some cases, trade secret) | Strong protection if patentable | Software patents have challenges (eligibility, prior art) |
A book, website, song, photograph, design | Copyright | Automatic protection upon fixation; registration gives stronger remedy | Protects expression, not ideas; limited term (life + 70 years) |
A business name, logo, slogan, product brand | Trademark / service mark | Distinctive source identifier; helps consumers distinguish | Must maintain use, register, combat infringement |
A secret formula, process, business model, customer list | Trade secret | No registration, indefinite duration (while secret) | Must maintain secrecy; risk of reverse engineering |
Overlaps and combinations are common. For example, a product may be covered by a patent (for its structural invention), a copyright (for its software or user interface), and a trademark (for its brand name). Meanwhile, some internal processes or unpatented know-how may be better protected via trade secrets.
As an IP attorney, I emphasize that patent protection is powerful—but it's not always the right road for every innovation. In many cases, trade secret protection or a mix of other IP tools might be more cost-effective.
What to Expect in This Blog Series
Here’s how the series will break down:
Part 2: Patents — What kinds of patents exist (utility, design, plant), eligibility, the prosecution process with the USPTO, strategic filing decisions (Kentucky or national context), enforcement, international patenting, and pitfalls.
Part 3: Copyrights — How copyright arises (automatic vs registration), what works are protected, exceptions (fair use, first sale, DMCA), registration benefits, enforcement, and state-level nuances.
Part 4: Trademarks — How to choose a strong mark, federal vs state registration, classes of goods/services, application strategy, examination and opposition, maintenance, enforcement, and using trademarks as assets.
Part 5: Trade Secrets — Definition under federal and Kentucky law, reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy, contracts and NDAs, misappropriation claims, defensive strategies, and litigation considerations.
At the end, we’ll provide a framework so businesses and creators in Kentucky (or anywhere) can audit what IP protections they should pursue and when to consult counsel.
Some Opening Lessons and Caveats
No one-size-fits-all — Not every innovation or creative work merits the cost and effort of a patent. For minor tweaks, trade secret or design protection may suffice.
Disclosure vs secrecy tension — Patents require public disclosure in exchange for a time-limited monopoly. Trade secrets demand that you keep critical information confidential. Choosing between them is strategic.
“Idea” alone is not protected — The law protects expressions (in copyright), novel inventions (in patents), or confidential information (in trade secret), but pure ideas—without implementation—are generally not protectable.
The first step is often documentation — Inventors and creators should document development steps, keep lab notebooks, mark drafts, use revision control, preserve metadata, and write confidentiality agreements with collaborators.
Timing matters — For patents, there are critical deadlines (e.g., filing before public disclosure or sale). For trademarks, early registration helps. For trade secrets, once it's public, it may lose protection.
Enforcement is your burden — IP rights don’t police themselves. Owners must monitor, enforce, and budget for litigation or alternative dispute resolution if infringement occurs.
International scope requires planning — If you expect to commercialize outside the U.S., you’ll need to consider foreign patent or trademark systems (e.g., PCT, regional filings). It’s not enough to rely only on your U.S. rights.
Closing Thoughts
Intellectual property is often the most valuable asset many businesses or creators hold—and yet too often it’s overlooked or undervalued. From a Kentucky startup inventing clean-energy hardware to a local artist creating a digital portfolio, each needs the right legal strategy to protect what they create. This is why you should turn to an attorney Lexington KY professionals recommend. As a patent attorney and IP practitioner, I look forward to guiding you in this blog series through the sometimes complex—but strategically critical—choices among patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
In the next post, we’ll dive deep into patents: what qualifies, how to file, prosecution strategies, and how to think about patent decisions in connection with Kentucky and national innovation.
Or let's start the conversation now. Reach out to us today.
Disclaimer
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Reading this post or contacting Embry Merritt Womack & Nance, PLLC through this website does not create an attorney–client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney regarding your specific situation before taking or refraining from any action based on this information.




Comments